Very Pure Chemicals
Over
the winter, the more than 80,000 artificial chemicals in common use
that have entered our environment, did not go into hibernation. They
were still in the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the foods
grown in the Southern Hemisphere. [For such accounting, Mexico is in the
Southern Hemisphere.] Soon, the farmers in the US will start planting
genetically engineered (GMO) seeds and spraying pesticides and
herbicides like Roundup.
In
a sneak attack, Monsatan (er, Monsanto) has slyly convinced farmers,
especially the industrial farms raising single crops, to plant GMO
corn, GMO soy, GMO canola (still called rapeseed in Canada), GMO cotton,
GMO sugar beets, and GMO alfalfa. In fact, over 90% of these crops that
are grown in the US are genetically engineered to be resistant to the
chemicals in Roundup and such friends, but to kill everything else – grasses, weeds, dandelions … earthworms? bees? butterflies?
Monsanto
and the other Big Biotechs have enlisted the help of rogue wordsmiths
to find synonyms for those words of the trade that might turn off fussy
consumers. So far as I know, no poets have accepted their employment.
Yet, they have come up with: bovine somatotropin (BST) to replace bovine growth hormone, genetic modification (GMO) for genetic engineering, and pure canola for rapeseed oil (packaged in plastic bottles, not glass).
The
FDA, the supposed guardian of consumers, doesn’t do its own research on
the safety of the products that we eat or use on our bodies. It relies
on the research submitted by the companies that apply for FDA approval –
studies financed by the chemical giants who have been known to cut the
funding of any research, before completion, that looks like it may
demonstrate harm from GMO foods. Speak of the fox guarding the chicken
coop.
Independent
research, largely done in UK, Germany, Italy, Austria, and Australia,
has indeed shown: severe inflammation of the stomach lining, tumor
formation of the intestinal wall, interference with reproductive
function, and suppression of the immune system — of mammals that are fed
GMO food.
When
a small experimental plot in California was found to contain GMO wheat,
despite Monsanto’s promises to the wheat farmers of the mid-west, their
substantial wheat exports to South Korea, Taiwan. and Japan were
cancelled by these Asian countries.
The
fall-out extended to non-GMO produce. The apple growers of Washington
State who use diphenylamine (DPA) to prevent the stored fruit from
turning brown, are stuck with 400 million apples because the Europeans
want nothing to do with them. DPA has been banned on all fruit treated
with that chemical in the 28 EU nations since 2012. To be sure, anything
grown in the US is suspect — rightly so, in light of the recent
scientific analyses of many common foods for glyphosate (Roundup)
residues. Alarmingly high levels of the chemical were found in 29
different foods commonly found on grocery shelves, including: Cheerios,
Oreos (ohh!), Doritos, baby foods, even spinach (wait till Popeye hears
of this).
Even
before this recent disturbing news came out, a few states had ballot
initiatives to require labeling of products with GMO ingredients, and
let consumers decide for themselves. The industry poured millions of $$
into the campaign and barely defeated these initiatives in California,
Oregon, and Washington. But, if GMOs were so advantageous to society and
so harmless to consume, why didn’t industry join the campaign to “Just
Label It?”
One
of the Gadfly Revelry & Research gang wondered, “Whatever did
farmers do before 1950 when there were few if any chemicals to spray on
crops?” Another gang member looked at him in a tone of eye that said,
“Mr. Pollyanna, they call it organic farming, now.”
Going
back to when Monsanto applied for a patent on the warped form of life
created by gene insertion, they told the Patent Office that it was
unique, never invented, and never found in Nature. After the patent was
granted, they told the public skeptics, “Don’t get so excited. It’s
nothing more than farmers have done for centuries by breeding plants and
animals —simple hybridization.”
Going
forward, the next candidates are GMO grasses and GMO salmon. What will
the hunters and fishermen say? They may suggest, instead, that Monsanto
executives need a few genes inserted for ethics and honesty.
<< Home