2 1/2 Minutes to Midnight — Part II

A previous Gadfly blog post addressed the matter of nuclear weapons and the carelessness of mankind in losing not just a few of the Doomsday Bombs. It also told of the depravity of governments in using the possession of the Bomb for political purposes. Part II now looks at the same ubiquity of human error re: civilian nuclear power plants.  

Pennsylvania has a special place in the annals of “Atoms for Peace.”  The very first commercial nuclear power plant in the US was brought on-line in 1957 at Shippenport on the shores of Lake Erie [as if Lake Erie were not polluted enough already]. Another nuclear power plant was built in 1974 on Three Mile Island in the Susquehanna River near Harrisburg. A PA poet told the story:

 

    When he said,

“This is how

    the sun works,

these are the rules that stars

    follow,” we

honored him

    but asked, “What

use to us unless we

      can coerce

the beads to

    dance and leap,

to play the First Fury?”

Too soon afterward, 1979 to be exact, Reactor Two of the TMI plant began to melt down, releasing significant radioactive emissions. “Significant” translates to a real increase in cancers over the following years in people downwind of radioactive emissions. Another first for PA.

Then in 1986, to assuage any jealousy of the US being first, the Russian nuclear power plant at Chernobyl (Reactor #4) suffered two explosions, followed by fires and a complete meltdown. Radioactivity spread wildly — not just 50 million curies, as reported by the IAEA, but 10 billion curies of radioactivity that spread around the entire Northern Hemisphere. In Ukraine, Belarus, and eastern Russia, the proportion of healthy births before 1986 was 80%. After the disaster, they fell to 20%!

A  book published in 2010, Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, reviewed over 5,000 scientific papers, most written in Slavic languages and never before translated into English. The authors report increased pathology of every organ system of many people in eastern and western Europe and Scandinavia. In the US and Canada, fallout reached us nine days later. The Mesopotamian gods: Enlil, the god of wind, and Adad, the god of storms, don’t stop at man-made boundary walls. In the US, four years later, 25% of all imported food was found to be contaminated.

We made it out of the 20th century without another major meltdown. But in 2011, Mother Nature showed us who’s in charge with an earthquake and a tsunami to add to human ill-judgement and arrogance. The result was the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan.

In the US, there are some 100 nuclear power plants — all aging. President Obama wanted more, and so did James Hansen, the environmental scientist. But, Wall Street, the Big Banks, and the Insurance Industry are all more guided by the bottom line than by politics. They all thought that renewables were less risky, faster, and cheaper. Pennsylvania has finally shown some good sense — the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant will be closed for good in 2019. Maine, however, beat us to the draw. The nuclear plant at the picturesque town of Wiscasset was closed  in 1992. 

The Gadfly Revelry & Research Team, not renowned for advocating the joys of Capitalism, used the logic of fun and common sense. They wrote: “You want to split the atom to make the heat to boil water for steam to drive turbines to make electricity?? Why not use technology that employs sun and wind and tides — all of which are cheaper, and require far less time to build? Maybe Nature is telling us something.”

The original 100+ nuclear power plants in the US were commissioned for 40 years. Most all of them were or are in the process of renewing their license to operate, despite their aging. Some are in the midst of a second renewal. The NRC, acting more like an agent for the nuclear industry than a regulatory agency that protects the public from radioactive disasters, both large and small, renews the licenses routinely. They were not even ashamed that they renewed licenses for three plants that later closed. Meanwhile, the radioactive “spent” fuel rods have to be stored on site, both at the plants that still operate and those that have been closed. Yes, Wiscasset still has radioactive waste stored in casks at the closed site.

When will they/we ever learn?

The War Against Cancer

The War Against Cancer has been going on since it was officially declared by President Nixon in 1971. Billions of dollars in research funding, given largely to Big Pharma to test out various drugs in cancer killing combinations were spent. Also, more tests and imaging studies were devised to find more cases of cancer to treat. And, the War goes on. I suppose it’s better than spending the money for the arms industry to provide us with more bombs and (somewhat) depleted uranium tank shells for the International War on Terror. 

In a previous Gadfly essay, I proposed that we attack the cause of epidemic of cancer, and even suggested a likely candidate — the chemical laden environment since WW II. No one in the research community has questioned the wildly increased incidence of breast and, especially, prostate cancer since the fifties, but neither has anyone suggested that the cause of the increase was the soup of artificial chemicals we live in. There seems to be a gentlemen’s agreement not to point fingers, especially at the agriculture industry.

This past summer I met Fouad, an Egyptian born researcher who has worked on prostate cancer for his whole professional life. Fouad is acknowledged as a principal research scientist at his institute in Scotland and the world over. He says that the farmers of Scotland who were exposed to high levels of pesticides and herbicides had the highest incidence of prostate cancer in the general population. Logic, of course, would have it that anything that is toxic to bugs and weeds is at least somewhat toxic to humans.

Add to my observations at City Hospital and to Fouad’s research, the experiences of the Vietnam veterans who came back from Agent Orange and settled in California. They were part of the back-to-the-land movement of the sixties and early seventies, but those knowledgeable about the herbicide and its effects on themselves and their comrades would not touch any farming that was not organic. They became the spearhead of the explosion of the organic farming movement. They worked not for temporary yield per acre, but for regeneration of the soil and sustainable farming.

Meanwhile, the chemical industry wasn’t  satisfied with selling pesticides and herbicides to family farmers who might question the toxic effect of the chemicals on themselves and their families. Neither did the public relations campaigns popularize the various uses of the chemicals. “Miracles through Chemistry” didn’t happen often. Nor was “Quick Henry, the Flit” without problems as DDT produced too-fragile eagle egg shells and an endangered eagle population.

So, the chemical industry encouraged large monocrop farms, often with corporate ownership. Anything less would be un-American or, at least, anti-capitalist. The number of man-made chemicals in the environment increased to the hundreds of thousands. A blood test would reveal dozens of such chemicals in our blood and, assumedly, in our tissues and organs, including our brains. Is it any wonder that Alzheimer’s disease is on the rise, as is dementia and memory loss. What will become of the Baby Boomer generation, already too sedentary?